BRIEF STATEMENT
ON ASSESSMENT
from Bill Carozza, Principal
If you walked into Harold Martin
School in mid May you will notice "TESTING-DO NOT DISTURB" signs on some
classroom doors, perhaps some nervous third graders sharpening their pencils,
and desks lined up in uncharacteristically straight rows. It is New Hampshire
Assessment time in our school and for better or worse, these two weeks change
the tenor of our building.
Up until the early 1990s, New Hampshire schools had very little curriculum
accountability apart from the local town. Most schools based their curriculum
on national standards, teacher or administrative preference, or school
board requests. Then the state developed curriculum frameworks for English/Language
Arts, Mathematics, Science, and Social Studies and fashioned tests to assess
how well each school was teaching the frameworks. Third graders take a
shortened version with just ELA and Math, while sixth graders and tenth
graders are tested on all four areas.
Third graders deal with their nervousness in May but teachers and administrators
start getting butterflies the following fall when scores are released.
Educators may not always like the scrutiny, but we generally admit that
the state assessments are useful.
Yet, with the changing landscape of public school assessment, teachers
are tempted to teach directly to the standards and try to cover as much
material as possible. The result can be a very dry and incomplete experience
for students. One of my important influences, Jay McTigue, an education
consultant from Maryland, speaks of this instructional strategy as the "bedsheet"
approach. Tremendous content is covered through the stretching out of the
sheet, but the result is a thin layer of understanding rather than a deeper
and more meaningful one. Instead, McTigue suggests identifying the
big ideas and concepts contained in the standards clustering facts and skills
under larger ideas and teach toward understanding these ideas.
"A teacher I worked with said these kinds of strategies about big ideas
provide ‘conceptual Velcro’ for the particulars and concepts to stick to,"
states McTigue. "I think that that’s very reflective of what we know about
learning." For example, a lesson on the Declaration of Independence should
not focus as much on the date the document was signed but on its significance
for our democracy.
I hope this provides a little insight into the curriculum and assessment
issues that we face as educators in this new millennium.