HOPKINTON SCHOOL DISTRICT

School Administrative Unit #66

204 Maple Street

Contoocook, NH 03229

Hopkinton School Board

Tuesday, March 3, 2009

I. Chair David Luneau called the meeting to order at 6:41 p.m. Present: Chair David Luneau, School Board members Larry Donahue, Liz Durant, Kim Fuller and Peter Yunich (arrived at 7:46 p.m.), Superintendent Dr. Brian Blake, Business Administrator Michelle Clark, Principal Steve Chamberlin (left at 7:35 pm.), and Administrative Assistant Tara Graham.

II. Additions/Deletions to the agenda:

A. None.

III. Correspondence

A. Dr. Blake received a letter from Commissioner Tracy regarding a waiver of the 180-day requirement due to the weather. Dr. Blake will be speaking with the Leadership Team regarding keeping the last day of school as June 24^th or making up some of the missed days.

IV. Approval of Minutes

A. Motion to approve the 2/17/09 minutes made by Mr. Donahue, seconded by Ms. Durant, motion passes, three in favor, one abstaining (Ms. Fuller), one absent (Mr. Yunich), minutes approved.

B. Motion to approve the 2/19/09 minutes made by Mr. Donahue, seconded by Ms. Durant, motion passes, three in favor, one abstaining (Mr. Donahue), one absent (Mr. Yunich), minutes approved.

V. Public Comments

A. Allan Bloomquist: Noted that the job of a moderator is to moderate, not to express opinions or run a debate. Mr. Bloomquist also stated that the $853,000.00 to be raised locally in the budget, he felt, ignored the current situation with the economy.

B. Janet Krzyzaniak: Noted that she is against requesting a waiver and that the school needs to be open for the full 180 days. Perhaps adding more days earlier in the year would be beneficial in the future? Ms. Krzyzaniak also expressed her concern over the number of days canceled, stating that it seems like they were much more frequent now then in generations past. Dr. Blake noted that the decision is based on many factors, but mainly, safety of the children is the biggest concern – many more children now take buses than walk to school, as they used to.

VI. Comments From the Hopkinton School Board

A. Dr. Brian Blake:

· Dr. Blake noted that there were some important contract-related dates coming out and passed out a handout including a list of all of these dates.

· Dr. Blake heard back from legal and the auditor regarding the collateral documents presented at the last meeting by the Treasurer, Allan Bloomquist. Both came back with positive reviews, Mr. Bloomquist was instructed to move forward with this.

· Dr. Blake commented on discussions at the national level regarding stimulus plans. Dr. Blake is participated in a webinar on the subject and they are available with updates weekly. Recently, he has learned that there will be no Title I funds, but will be an additional $214,000.00 in additional IDEA funds, 50% of which can be used in other areas. We should see the money between now and July.

B. Mr. Luneau:

· Mr. Luneau thanked all, being the last meeting with the current Board (Ms. Fuller will not be running for re-nomination).

· Mr. Luneau met with Governor Lynch, Representative Richardson and a Selectman to discuss revenue and the future of education in the state. Governor Lynch stated that it is expected for all state revenue sources that were relied on in the past, to be fully funded in the coming year. Any local stimulus money will be used to sustain and improve schools with a focus on the current economy. There was also an encouraging discussion on H2O – the Governor suggested perhaps partnering with other local schools, universities, etc. He was very supportive of this program and encouraged the District to write a proposal for funding as well as providing us with a list of “first come, first serve” grant opportunities. Projects that are smaller or “ready to go” will be looked at more favorably.

C. Mr. Donahue noted his appreciation for Ms. Fuller’s time serving on the Board, her passion and being the Board “conscience”.

D. Ms. Durant also expressed her appreciation to Ms. Fuller. She also talked about her experience as a chaperone on the Zealand Falls trip and what a fantastic experience it was for all involved.

E. Ms. Fuller expressed her gratitude for all of the incredible people she had worked with during her 12 years on the Board, she thanked everyone for giving tirelessly of their time for the students of the district. She expressed that she has had an incredible time and would be more than willing to join in on committees, etc. in the future.

VII. Items For Board Discussion

A. Warrant Articles

· Handouts were included in the Board packets, Dr. Blake briefly reviewed the process, each article, and assigned speakers for each article.

· Each member weighed in on their opinion on SB2.

§ Mr. Luneau was against SB2, stating that meetings are replaced with deliberative sessions with a typically poor turnout, resulting in a small group weighing the issues for the majority – articles moved and modified by special interests.

§ Mr. Donahue was against SB2, stating that it would negatively affect important discussions that decisions on the budget are based on.

§ Ms. Fuller was against SB2, stating that it takes away a voice for informed decisions.

§ Mr. Yunich and Ms. Durant chose not to state an opinion either way on the subject.

B. Barb Jenkins/Paul Silverman - Chorus

· The Choral contract could not be solidified for the 2^nd semester until now, due to a need to wait until it was known if there were enough students in Mr. Silverman’s music theory class. Since there were not, Mr. Silverman and Ms. Jenkins will again be splitting Chorus duties – Mr. Silverman as Choral Director (nights, out of school, etc.) and High School Chorus instructor and Ms. Jenkins with the middle school. The difference is a cost increase on Mr. Silverman’s side of $37.00 (due to seniority).

C. Extra class for Patty Connolly and Paul Silverman

· 1/10^th PE course for Ms. Connolly, 1/20^th choral course for Mr. Silverman.

· A smaller (14-16 students) PE course was added to reduce the class sizes they had (30+ students, now only about 24).

· Choral course explained above.

D. Spring Schedule B Nominations

· Mr. Chamberlin reviewed the list provided in the Board packets. Spring sports will begin in 3 weeks (from the date of the meeting).

E. Harold Martin School Floor

· The new floor was installed and there are serious questions regarding the quality of it already, particularly since the cost had increased from our quote due to materials and fuel costs.

· The Board was asked to sign off of the Repair and Maintenance Trust withdrawal – as it was already paid for.

· Dr. Blake and Ms. Clark will hold a conference call on March 4^th with the floor company to see what can be done about this.

VIII. Public Comments

A. Merle Dustin: Stated she is for SB2 because it gives everyone the opportunity to vote, for example, seniors that cannot sit all day in a district meeting.

B. Janet Krzyzaniak: Stated her concern that if SB2 passes, people will vote “no” on everything to lower their taxes because it is more private voting and a small majority will sway the public.

C. Allan Bloomquist: Stated that the federal stimulus could be a huge help, should be examined if it could be applied to help the tax hit. Also, technology, he feels, is very important and he didn’t see a technology committee on the H2O committees. Mr. Donahue responded, that is because it is integrated throughout all of the committees.

IX. Action Items

A. Recommend the Hopkinton School Board take a position against the warrant article SB2. Mr. Donahue motioned, Ms. Fuller seconded, four in favor, one opposed (Mr. Yunich), motion carries 4-1.

B. Recommend the Hopkinton School Board rescind the August 12, 2008 nomination for high school Choral Director (Barb Jenkins), and approve the nomination of Paul Silverman and Barb Jenkins to share the Chorus Director position. Mr. Donahue motioned, Ms. Durant seconded, four in favor, one opposed (Mr. Yunich), motion carries 4-1.

C. Recommend the Hopkinton School Board approve the proposed extra class for Patty Connolly and Paul Silverman at the high school. Mr. Donahue motioned, Ms. Durant seconded, four in favor, one opposed (Mr. Yunich), motion carries 4-1.

D. Recommend the Hopkinton School Board approve the Spring Schedule B nominations as presented, with a current total of $27,255.00 and 4 positions still not filled. Mr. Donahue motioned, Ms. Fuller seconded, four in favor, one opposed (Mr. Yunich), motion carries 4-1.

X. Mr. Donahue moved at 9:04 p.m. and Ms. Durant seconded that the Board enter non-public session as provided in (RSA 91-A:3, II (a)(c)) to discuss negotiations and personnel. Motion passed on a roll call vote- Mr. Donahue, Ms. Durant, Mr. Luneau, and Mr. Yunich, (all) in favor.

XI. Following a motion by Mr. Yunich, seconded by Mr. Donahue, roll call vote- Mr. Donahue, Ms. Durant, Mr. Luneau, and Mr. Yunich, (all) in favor, the board came out of non-public session at 10:30 p.m.

XII. Following a motion by Ms. Durant, seconded by Mr. Donahue, the board voted to seal the minutes of the non-public session for one year. Motion passed on a roll call vote- Mr. Donahue, Ms. Durant, Mr. Luneau, and Mr. Yunich, (all) in favor.

XIII. Motion to adjourn by Mr. Donahue, seconded by Ms. Durant. Motion passed on a roll call vote- Mr. Donahue, Ms. Durant, Mr. Luneau, and Mr. Yunich, (all) in favor.

Adjourned at 10:32 p.m.

Respectfully submitted, Tara D. Graham

Hopkinton School Board Meeting Minutes

Tuesday, March 3, 2009

Maple Street School, Hopkinton NH

Non-public minutes

XIX. Non-Public Session (RSA 91-A:3, II (a)(c)).

During the non-public session, the Board discussed personnel.

Mr. Yunich motioned to come out of Non-Public Session, seconded by Mr. Donahue. Motion passed on a roll call vote- Mr. Donahue, Ms. Durant, Mr. Luneau, and Mr. Yunich, (all) in favor, the board came out of non-public session at 10:30 p.m.

MINUTES

HOPKINTON SCHOOL DISTRICT MEETING

HOPKINTON HIGH SCHOOL, CONTOOCOOK NH

MARCH 7, 2009

Moderator Charles Dibble called the annual meeting of the Hopkinton School District to order at 9:02 a.m.

The Moderator recognized Linda Walsh, Hopkinton Elementary School teacher for 22 years, and Curt Martin, Elementary Physical Education teacher for 31 years, who led the Pledge of Allegiance.

The Moderator introduced the Flag Bearers of Boy Scouts of America from the third grade at Harold Martin School: Seamus Quinn, Zachary Barnes, Tyler Campbell, Brandon Ehrmanntraut, Jackson Locke and Andrew Manseau. The Moderator then introduced Emma Donahue to sing the National Anthem.

The Moderator introduced Sue Batchelder, School District Clerk; Carol McCann, Supervisor of the Checklist; and Tom Barry of Nixon, Raiche, Vogelman, representing the School District. Childcare services have been provided by the Hopkinton High School National Honor Society. Appreciation to Rick Schaefer and members of the Hopkinton Middle High School custodial staff for the arrangements and set up for the School District meeting. Thanks also to Steven Lux for his help with the PA system.

The Moderator introduced David Luneau, Chair of the Hopkinton School Board, for the purpose of introducing school administrators and the Board as follows: Dr. Brian Blake, Superintendent; Steve Chamberlin, Principal, Hopkinton Middle High School; Chris Kelley, Assistant Principal, Hopkinton Middle High School; Michael Bessette, Principal, Maple Street School; Bill Carozza, Principal, Harold Martin School; Michelle Clark, Business Administrator; Dr. Valerie Aubry, Director of Student Services; and Matt Stone, Director of Technology. Members of the Board include: Larry Donahue, Liz Durant, Kim Fuller, and Peter Yunich.

Opening remarks were made by David Luneau. Mr. Luneau called for a moment of silence in memory of Toby Wood, the Hopkinton Hawks greatest supporter. Mr. Luneau recognized Kim Fuller, outgoing Board member. Ms. Fuller thanked her family, the Board, all of the faculty and staff and the community as a parent and Board member.

The Moderator explained the parliamentary procedures for the meeting. Tom Congoran asked for clarification regarding Articles II and III; the Moderator explained that if Article II fails, Article III would give authority to the School Board to call another meeting to renegotiate the teacher’s contract. Mr. Congoran asked what would happen if Article III also fails. Mr. Barry explained that if Article II fails, the School Board must, by law, continue to negotiate in good faith for another contract. The purpose of Article III is to avoid the necessity, and cost to the district, of petitioning the Superior Court to hold a separate meeting if a new agreement is reached.

Dave Boughton asked if Article VIII fails the district would then operate under last year’s budget with allowances for statutory obligations. The Moderator explained that the Hopkinton School District does not have a default budget at the present time, so an amendment to the article would be needed to approve a budget.

The Moderator recognized David Luneau for a presentation regarding today’s meeting. Mr. Luneau gave an overview of the highlights and strengths within our district and comparative costs. He discussed the initiative Hopkinton 2.0, which is researching new ways to improve the district without raising costs. He discussed the business and educational experience of the current Board; ongoing improvements in energy efficiency in the buildings; and the search for our next superintendent.

Mr. Luneau then gave an overview of the budget process. The process begins approximately 20 months prior to its inception. The School Board looked at a flat 0% increase, 2.5% budget increase and a 5% increase, and settled on a 3.4% aggregate funded increase, which would include all three collective bargaining agreements. This includes $240,000 in cuts from the superintendent’s budget. The budget represents a 1.07% increase over this year’s budget, and includes the cost for programs and current salaries for nonunion employees. Cuts included two elementary teaching positions; 4/5 of an elementary reading position; several instructional assistants; and program cuts in middle school sports, some elementary arts and science programs, high school class sections in world language, science, history and music, and cuts in the CRTC vocational program, building and maintenance funds, and nonunion salary increases.

In brief, the three bargaining agreements are as follows: a one-year HEA contract for teachers, at a cost of $270,000, which represents a 3.8% salary increase; the HESS contract for support staff, at a cost of $62,000 for the first year, representing a 5.67% salary increase, and an employee dental plan; and the Teamster’s Local 633 contract for custodians at a cost of $8,200 for the first year, representing a 2% increase, over a 5 year term, with some additional benefit changes.

The final increases were to a contingency fund and to the repair and maintenance trust, to allow the School Board to address emergency issues and repairs.

Mr. Luneau closed by recognizing Harold Martin School for 50 years of excellence in education, and he urged the community to visit the district’s web site for information: www.hopkintonschools.org.

The Moderator recognized Kim Fuller for the purpose of moving Article I.

ARTICLE I: Kim Fuller moved and Liz Durant seconded that the School District hear reports of agents, auditors, committees, and officers chosen or to take any other action in relation thereto.

The Moderator called for discussion. Hearing none, the Moderator called for a voice vote and Article I passed.

The Moderator recognized Peter Yunich for the purpose of moving Article II.

ARTICLE II: Peter Yunich moved and Kim Fuller seconded that the School District vote to approve the cost items included in the Collective Bargaining Agreement reached between the Hopkinton School Board and the Hopkinton Education Association, which calls for the following increases in salaries and benefits:

Year Estimated Increase

2009-2010 $270,265

and further to raise and appropriate the sum of Two hundred seventy thousand, two hundred and sixty-five dollars ($270,265) for the 2009-2010 fiscal year, such sum representing the additional costs attributable to the increase in salaries and benefits over those of the appropriation at current staffing levels paid in the 2008-2009 fiscal year.

Mr. Yunich noted that the School Board recommends this article and the Budget Committee does not recommend the article. He further stated that the contract was negotiated in good faith; by law, the amount of the contract can be voted up or down, but the contract cannot be amended on the floor. The HEA contract is a one-year agreement for $270,265, equating to an average increase of 3.67%, representing 35 cents of the $1.10 tax increase. The increase applied to salary schedules of 2.65% compares to 3.25 % for the current contract, which compounded annually over three years. The salary increase applies to all step and track payments. No other terms were altered from the current agreement.

The Moderator called for discussion on Article II. Karen Irwin, chair of the Budget Committee, explained that the increase would represent a difference between the Budget Committee’s budget and the School Board’s budget of .57/1000 valuation, or $228 on a $400,000 home. The average salary increase would be $2,185.45. Fifty-nine teachers would receive a 2-3% increase, five teachers would receive between 3.1 and 4%, nine would receive 4.1-5%, twenty-one would receive 5.1-6%, and 10 teachers would receive over 6.1 percent. Since it is the right of the town to vote contract up or down, the Budget Committee voted the contract down to continue support programs in the schools in difficult economic times.

Scott Flood asked for clarification on the phrasing of Article II. The Moderator explained that the procedure is approve the contract and then raise the money to fund it, all of which is encompassed within the article. If the district approves a multi-year contract, we are locked into it without alteration. Mr. Flood asked Mr. Yunich if the .35/1000 of the $1.10/1000 aggregate of the total increase would be $852,000 if we include all warrants? Mr. Yunich affirmed that it would. The tax rate is set in the fall, and assumes the current situation will remain. If the economic climate falls, other revenues such as the room and meals tax may change. The ongoing reassessment will affect the rate, as the values are going down. These factors will drive up the mill rate, so the tax rate is likely to increase above what is projected.

Diane LaChance asked whether there were any changes to health care benefits in the proposed contract, and Mr. Yunich replied that there are no changes. Ms. LaChance remarked that considering health benefit changes, such as having spouses covered under their own companies’ plans rather than the school district’s plan, would save us money. She does not support the contract.

Ian Tewksbury thanked the School Board for the time invested in negotiating the contract. He was disappointed that the Budget Committee does not support it. He is concerned that we may lose good teachers to better-paying districts, and that teachers may have smaller paychecks due to increased health care costs.

Allan Bloomquist reported on research he did at the Department of Education regarding the cost per pupil in the district. The state uses an average cost per pupil, and the School Board uses a median cost per district, which doesn’t take into consideration the economies of scale. In the school district’s method there is a 3% difference in cost; in the state’s method, Hopkinton has a $1,838 greater cost per student, amounting to a $1.8 million difference. Mr. Bloomquist urges the district to use the state’s method as a comparative measure and he considers the budget increase irresponsible. The economy is negatively impacting Hopkinton taxpayers, so we should all work together to survive.

Jane Bradstreet spoke against the warrant. In 2005-2006, there was a $13.5 million budget for 1045 students and 147 full time equivalent employees, and we received a Blue Ribbon award. Today we are looking at a $16.2 million budget for 975 students and 191 full time equivalents. The difference is a $2.7 million increase, a 70 student decrease and a 44 FTE increase. These are the reasons why we must vote no. This is not a condemnation of teachers; we can still have good schools with better fiscal management.

Arnold Coda asked for clarification on Article II, as to whether there would be two votes needed to approve the contract and to fund it. The Moderator indicated that both parts are included in the article. Mr. Coda asked what the percentage of contributions by the teachers to the health plan would be under the proposed contract. Mr. Yunich replied that there are three plans, and the contributions are either 13% or $1,950, $1,500 or $900 respectively, whichever is less. Mr. Coda commented that nowhere else in the world is the employee health contribution so small. He further noted that the amount presented in Article II is not just $270,000, but would include raises in other things tied to salaries as well, such as stipends.

Fred Briccetti supports the teachers, but in difficult economic times, the principle of the decision of whether to grant raises under the circumstances is important.

Mr. Luneau remarked on the importance of a strong contract to attract and keep the best teachers. Teacher turnover is bad for schools, so strong contracts are an investment over time.

Mary French asked for clarification on Article II, whether teachers would be paid the same as last year if Article VIII passes; this was affirmed. She noted that teachers in other districts are not getting raises, and some are not taking raises in order to keep teachers.

Brenda Litchfield noted that as a commercial lender, her clients are using zero-based raises, and most have cut employee insurance programs. Some of those who have done so have been experiencing high turnover. She asked whether the district had considered zero-based raises, but Mr. Yunich replied that the Board is prohibited by law from discussing the process.

Kathy Schoch asked whether the teachers are reimbursed for some percentage of their health care costs under the current contract. Mr. Donahue replied that until the contract prior to the current one, the district had created a “Comp 1000” plan, under which employees were reimbursed $900 of their costs. It was a less expensive alternative to a traditional Comp 100 plan. The current contract has a true Comp 100 plan instead. Some of the purpose of this was to migrate from an expensive to a less expensive plan over time.

Mike Bewersdorf asked whether health care is considered part of salary. Mr. Yunich replied that health care and pensions are not part of the salary warrant, but are included in the operating budget. Mr. Bewersdorf asked whether benefits are part of the salary calculations, and Mr. Yunich replied that they are not, and further clarified that the district pays 87% of the cost of the health care plans.

Patrice Gerseny, Budget Committee member, noted that the Budget Committee wanted to reduce the proposed increase, and the options were through the operating budget or contracts. Since the negotiated contract cannot be changed, the reduction would have to come from the operating budget, which would mean staff cuts. She supports the proposed budget.

Mark Zankel moved here for the excellent education provided by the district. He asked how Hopkinton salaries compare with those across the state, if teacher retention is an issue. The Board did not have a comparison on hand, but Dr. Blake stated that salaries are above average.

David Lancaster of the Budget Committee noted that the committee worked hard on the budget. He reported that 59% of Hopkinton teachers earn more than $60,000, 18.5% earn more than $70,000, and one teacher earns $85,000. He does not anticipate a mass exodus because teachers are paid well. He noted that every dollar spent to pay teachers would require a cut elsewhere, and take away from programs. He asked the voters to hold all salaries for a year, and see the shape of the economy next year.

Cameron Ford from the Budget Committee noted that five homes in his area have been repossessed, so it would be wrong to give raises while people are losing their jobs.

Stretch Kennedy noted that teachers are some of the best-paid town employees; we must pay our work force, but holding off on raises for a year will not impose burden. All are hurting in this economy.

Meredith Pfundstein thanked the teachers and the School Board. She noted that there are other ways to retain good employees; if we can’t afford to give raises, we should speak with the teachers to find out what else can be done to ensure that they know they are appreciated.

Betsy Ciocci noted that the teachers work beyond their contract to provide an excellent education. She also noted that the salary level for those with greater increases is probably less to begin with; some teachers have advanced degrees, which also accounts for higher salary levels. Passing the contracts also will mean that they will be staggered, so that voters will not be asked to vote on three contracts at once.

Curt Shuster chose to move to Hopkinton for the schools. He noted that Hopkinton is ranked in the top 3% of schools in NH, and in the top 5% in the nation, but NH teacher salaries are ranked 25^th in the nation.

Tom Yestramski was disappointed that the School Board brought any increase to the voters. There is no work, and all are struggling to pay taxes. He pays $1300 per month for health insurance, which has gone up 48% in a year. Nationally the unemployment rate is 8.1% as of today.

Hearing no further discussion, the Moderator called for a ballot vote. Article II failed 443-157.

David Lancaster moved and Richard Kennedy seconded to restrict reconsideration of Article II. The motion passed by voice vote.

The Moderator recognized Mr. Yunich for the purpose of moving Article III.

ARTICLE III: Peter Yunich moved and Kim Fuller seconded that the School District, if Article II is defeated, authorize the governing body to call one special meeting, at its option, to address Article II cost items only.

The Moderator called for discussion.

Tom Congoran urged voters to vote no because there would be less representation at a subsequent meeting.

Some discussion was held regarding the exact meaning and implications of Article III. Mr. Barry explained that past practice was for school boards, once a new contract had been negotiated, to petition the Superior Court for another meeting to vote on the new contract; the intent of this article is to eliminate the necessity of petitioning the court, which is costly to the district. If a contract is voted down, the School Board is obligated to negotiate in good faith for a new contract. Since the salaries for the upcoming year, minus the increases in the warrant, are included in the operating budget, the schools can operate without a contract. The process must continue by law until a contract is passed.

Allan Bloomquist urged voters to vote no on Article III, because petitioning the court would provide voters with better notification of the meetings than we had this year.

The Moderator closed discussion on Article III and called for a standing vote. Article III passed by a vote of 353 to 178.

The Moderator recognized Kim Fuller for the purpose of moving Article IV.

ARTICLE IV: Kim Fuller moved and Peter Yunich seconded that the School District vote to approve the cost items included in the Collective Bargaining Agreement reached between the Hopkinton School Board and the Hopkinton Educational Support Staff, which calls for the following increases in salaries and benefits:

Year Estimated Increase

2009-2010 $61,846

2010-2011 $66,852

and further to raise and appropriate the sum of Sixty-one thousand eight hundred and forty-six dollars ($61,846) for the 2009-2010 fiscal year, such sum representing the additional costs attributable to the increase in salaries and benefits over those of the appropriation at current staffing levels paid in the 2008-2009 fiscal year. The Hopkinton School Board recommends the article and the Hopkinton Budget Committee does not recommend this article.

The Moderator opened the floor to discussion.

Karen Irwin explained that this article would have an impact of .08/1000 on tax rate. The Budget Committee did not support this article because all employees under all contracts should be treated equally.

The Moderator noted that this is a two-year agreement; an affirmative vote would approve the contract and fund the first year of the contract.

Patrice Gerseny further explained that the Budget Committee did not recommend increases in Articles II, IV, VI, or the increases for non-union employees in the operating budget.

David Lancaster asked whether the School Board could find money in the operating budget for the second year if voters vote down the increase for next year. Mr. Donahue explained that if using the current membership in HESS, the cost impact of the second year of the contract would be $66,852. There will not be a separate warrant article for the second year – if passed, the increase will be part of the operating budget. After some discussion, Mr. Donahue further explained that the district is not required to pay that amount; the exact amount paid will depend on the number of employees during the second year, and thus may increase or decrease.

Hearing no further debate, the Moderator called for a ballot vote, and Article IV failed, 342-143.

The Moderator recognized Kim Fuller to move Article V.

ARTICLE V: Kim Fuller moved and Peter Yunich seconded that the School District, if Article IV is defeated, authorize the governing body to call one special meeting, at its option, to address Article IV cost items only.

The Moderator called for discussion. Hearing none, the Moderator called for a vote, and Article V passed by voice vote.

The Moderator recognized Mr. Yunich to move Article VI.

ARTICLE VI: Peter Yunich moved and Kim Fuller seconded that the School District vote to approve the cost items included in the Collective Bargaining Agreement reached between the Hopkinton School Board and the Teamsters Local No. 633 of New Hampshire, which calls for the following increases in salaries and benefits:

Year Estimated Increase

2009-2010 $8,290

2010-2011 $9,908

2011-2012 $11,592

2012-2013 $12,918

2013-2014 $14,226

and further to raise and appropriate the sum of Eight thousand two hundred and ninety dollars ($8,290) for the 2009-2010 fiscal year, such sum representing the additional costs attributable to the increase in salaries and benefits over those of the appropriation at current staffing levels paid in the 2008-2009 fiscal year. The Hopkinton School Board recommends this article and the Hopkinton Budget Committee does not recommend the article.

Mr. Yunich noted that this is a five-year agreement. The increase would be 1.94%, or .01 of the total tax increase in the proposed budget. The total cost over 5 years would be 2.5% non-compounded, calculated on the same base line, based on current employment levels. It includes an increased payment to a single member dental plan of $600 per year, and the addition of Christmas Eve as a holiday.

Ms. Irwin reported that the Budget Committee looked at this article in the same way as the other two articles, and chose to treat all contract increases equally.

Arnold Coda spoke in favor or Article VI. The custodial staff does an excellent job and is not well paid at present.

Mr. Yunich noted that the total cost of this agreement paid over a 5-year term is 2.5%, not 2.5% per year. This amount does include the increase in dental benefits.

Mary French urged voters to vote no on Article VI.

Mr. Kennedy asked whether this contract covers school bus drivers? Mr. Yunich noted that there is a separate contract with the school bus company and school bus drivers.

Beth Bloomquist spoke in favor of Article VI.

Hearing no further discussion, the Moderator called for a voice vote, and Article VI passed.

ARTICLE VII: Since Article VI passed, Article VII was passed over.

The Moderator recognized David Luneau to move Article VIII.

ARTICLE VIII: David Luneau moved and Larry Donahue seconded that the School District vote to raise and appropriate as an operating budget, the Budget Committee’s recommended amount of Fifteen million six hundred twenty thousand six hundred and forty-two ($15,620,642) for the support of schools, for the payment of salaries for the school district officials and agents, and for the payment of statutory obligations of the district, or to take any other action in relation thereto. This article does not include appropriations voted in other warrant articles.

Mr. Luneau noted that the School Board initially recommended an amount of $15,688,564, but given the failure of two of the three collective bargaining agreements, the School Board now supports the Budget Committee’s amount. The operating budget would represent an increase over the current budget of $78,691, or .063%. This includes all operating costs, including current salaries. He noted that the district operates in the black; there is supposed to be money left over, to reduce the amount of taxes needed each subsequent year. Last year the district passed forward $570,000; this year it will be closer to $235,000. He referred to the school district report for a detailed breakdown of the budget.

Money from other sources includes a grant from the state of New Hampshire of $3,752,073; we have recently received an assurance from governor that these funds will come. The economic stimulus package, food service sales, tuition, and interest all provide income, although we did experience a loss of interest income. The tax impact for this article would be $289,683 over last year, or .37/1000 on the tax rate, which would translate to $74 on a $200,000 home.

Karen Irwin explained that in this operating budget, the School Board had anticipated a difference in revenue of $320,000 between last year and this year, primarily based on the increase in the surplus. The Budget Committee requested that losses anticipated in the food service program by changed from $60,000 to $30,000, to increase the surplus. There was initially a .57/1000 difference between the Budget Committee’s and the School Board’s budgets; now that the School Board is in agreement with the Budget Committee, the increase has been reduced from $852,000 to approximately $400,000 after the defeat of the other articles. The Budget Committee encourages continued efforts in initiatives such as Hopkinton 2.0 to continue to support teachers.

Arnold Coda moved and Al Wait seconded that Article VIII be amended as follows: that the School District vote to raise and appropriate as an operating budget the amount of Fifteen million two hundred thirty thousand six hundred and forty-two ($15,230,642) for the support of schools, for the payment of salaries for the school district officials and agents, and for the payment of statutory obligations of the district, or to take any other action in relation thereto. He explained that the purpose of the amendment was to take revenues and expenses into account and produce a flat budget.

The Moderator opened the floor to discussion on the amendment.

Marion Paxton stated that with the projected decrease in the number of students from this year to next year, the dollar amount per student would be approximately the same under the amendment.

Ed Kaplan noted that it is unusual for the School Board and the Budget Committee to be in agreement. He endorsed the budget as originally submitted, and asked what changes would be made if the amendment passed.

Mr. Luneau reviewed the cuts that have already been made, and listed the following possible cuts if the amendment passes: $60,000 for all books; all middle school sports; the technology integrator position; a 5% cut in supplies, thirteen teaching positions, and seven office positions. The final classes at the high school in World Languages, Science and Math would be eliminated, and the new graduation requirements would have to be reviewed to see whether they can be met with fewer sections of the required classes.

Ms. LaChance urged the community to become more involved, specifically in researching programmatic, zero-based budgets. Each year, programs reevaluated from the bottom up to see what is needed.

Mr. Lancaster spoke against the amendment. It took a lot of work to come to mutual agreement between the School Board and the Budget Committee, and the board came down to the Budget Committee’s number. The amendment is too large a cut all at once, and the district is making strides in cutting costs.

Marshall Rowe supported both Mr. Lancaster and Ms. LaChance’s comments. The district does need to find better ways to support schools. The perception that Hopkinton has excellent schools has drawn people to live here for many years, and he was concerned that the district was dividing into two separate groups – those who currently work and are not getting raises, and those who are retired and receive a Social Security increase. He noted that current workers pay the benefits of former workers, and the children will be paying the benefits for current workers. He will vote against the amendment.

Mr. Bloomquist noted that Social Security does not increase as much as taxes.

Michael Tierney spoke against the amendment. The proposed cuts under the amendment are confusing, and don’t seem to add up, but the budget as presented was fair.

Mr. Luneau clarified that the positions to be cut include full time reductions to part time and some part time positions.

Patrice Gerseny spoke against the amendment. The Budget Committee because of the current economic environment conservatively looked at revenues. If we do not appropriate funds, they cannot be spent; let the School Board return to the district what is not spent.

Scott Flood – The tax increase rate of .37/1000 is based upon the fall’s numbers and there are other factors such as the increase in valuations that will impact the tax rate for this coming fall which will take into account reductions, increase in valuations, will impact articles; the changes will affect the December bills, not the June bills.

Mr. Kennedy spoke against the amendment in agreement with Ms. Gerseny’s points, and thanked the voters for attending the meeting.

Steve Adams asked what the operating budget amount would be to keep the tax rate the same as at present. After some discussion, it was determined to be $15,436,951.

Shannon Hudgens spoke against the amendment. We have elected the School Board and should trust their judgment.

Gary Richardson moved the question.

The Moderator called for a vote on the amendment to Article VIII. The motion to amend Article VIII failed by voice vote.

The Moderator called for further discussion on the article.

Steve Adams made a motion to amend Article VIII as follows: to raise and appropriate as an operating budget, the amount of Fifteen million four hundred thirty six thousand nine hundred and fifty one ($15,436,951) for the support of schools, for the payment of salaries for the school district officials and agents, and for the payment of statutory obligations of the district, or to take any other action in relation thereto. There was no second for the motion, so the motion failed.

Discussion was held regarding whether a ballot vote on Article VIII, which had been petitioned, would be necessary. Mr. Flood pointed out that the appropriate statute allows for a ballot vote with five signatures, and the Moderator’s duty is to hold the ballot.

Hearing no further discussion, the Moderator called for a ballot vote and Article VIII passed, 371-106.

Larry Donahue moved and Kim Fuller seconded to restrict reconsideration of Article VIII, and the motion passed by voice vote.

ARTICLE IX: Larry Donahue moved and Liz Durant seconded that the School District vote to raise and appropriate the sum of Fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) for the purpose of a General Contingency Fund to meet the cost of unanticipated expenses that may arise during the year and to expend said funds or to take any other action in relation thereto.

Mr. Donahue noted that the funds are for emergency services, such as repairs or spikes in oil prices.

The Moderator called for discussion. Hearing none, the Moderator called for a voice vote and Article IX passed.

The Moderator recognized Liz Durant for the purpose of moving Article X.

ARTICLE X: Liz Durant moved and Larry Donahue seconded that the School District vote to raise and appropriate up to Seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000) to be added to the School Building Repair and Maintenance Trust Fund, established March 6, 1993, and authorize the School Board to transfer up to Seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000) from the year end undesignated fund balance (surplus) available on June 30, 2009, or to take any other action in relation thereto.

Ms. Durant noted that the repair and maintenance trust fund was for catastrophic events and immediate repairs. We have been putting $60,000 per year into the fund for the past five years; we have $106,000 in the account at the present time. The superintendent recommends that the fund be increased to $200,00-250,000 by 2012. There is no additional tax impact from this article.

Hearing no further discussion, the Moderator called for a voice vote and Article X passed.

The Moderator recognized Kim Fuller for the purpose of moving Article XI.

ARTICLE XI: Kim Fuller moved and David Luneau seconded Article XI, to transact any other business that may legally come before the meeting.

Richard Gourley asked for the number of enrolled students at present, which is 975.

Roger Turcotte mentioned that SB2 will be on Tuesday’s ballot, and although it is more convenient, he is not in favor of it, because we can best manage our programs at the district meeting.

Janet Krzyzaniak thanked the School Board and administration for the numerous hours spent working on the budget. She commended Michelle Clark, business administrator, in particular for her efforts.

David Lancaster referred to mention in today’s Concord Monitor that SB2 ‘fails to promote transparent discussion’ but he noted that under SB2, voters can debate articles at the deliberative session. He asked for the total number of registered voters in town, which is 4,655, and the total number present at today’s meeting, which is 633.

Beth Bloomquist supports SB2 because there is no absentee ballot possible for school district meetings, for those who cannot attend. She would like to see greater than 10% of the registered voters participating.

Gary Richardson called today’s meeting a good exercise in democracy. If SB2 had passed, we would likely not have a budget today because it would have been voted down. He commended the School Board for listening to the voters.

Motion to adjourn made by Larry Donahue and seconded by David Luneau was passed at 2:06 p.m.

Respectfully submitted,

Sue Batchelder

School District Clerk

HOPKINTON SCHOOL DISTRICT

School Administrative Unit #66

204 Maple Street

Contoocook, NH 03229

Hopkinton School Board

Monday, March 9, 2009

XIII. Chair David Luneau called the meeting to order at 1:05 p.m. Present: Chair David Luneau, School Board members Larry Donahue, Liz Durant, Kim Fuller and Peter Yunich.

XIV. Mr. Donahue moved at 1:06 p.m. and Ms. Durant seconded that the Board enter non-public session as provided in (RSA 91-A:3, II (a)(c)) to discuss personnel. Motion passed on a roll call vote- Mr. Donahue, Ms. Durant, Ms. Fuller, Mr. Luneau, and Mr. Yunich, (all) in favor.

XV. Following a motion by Mr. Donahue, seconded by Ms. Durant, roll call vote- Mr. Donahue, Ms. Durant, Ms. Fuller, Mr. Luneau, and Mr. Yunich, (all) in favor, the board came out of non-public session at 2:47 p.m.

XVI. Following a motion by Mr. Donahue, seconded by Ms. Durant, the board voted to seal the minutes of the non-public session for one year. Motion passed on a roll call vote- Mr. Donahue, Ms. Durant, Ms. Fuller, Mr. Luneau, and Mr. Yunich, (all) in favor.

XVII. Following a motion by Mr. Donahue, seconded by Ms. Fuller, the board voted to authorize the Chair to negotiate an employment contract with the finalist for the position of Superintendent of the Hopkinton School District. Motion passed on a roll call vote- Mr. Donahue, Ms. Durant, Ms. Fuller, Mr. Luneau, and Mr. Yunich, (all) in favor.

XVIII. Motion to adjourn by Mr. Donahue, seconded by Ms. Durant. Motion passed on a roll call vote- Mr. Donahue, Ms. Durant, Ms. Fuller, Mr. Luneau, and Mr. Yunich, (all) in favor.

Adjourned at 2:50 p.m.

Respectfully submitted, Chair, David J. Luneau

HOPKINTON SCHOOL DISTRICT

School Administrative Unit #66

204 Maple Street

Contoocook, NH 03229

Hopkinton School Board

Tuesday, March 17, 2009

I. Chair David Luneau called the meeting to order at 6:35 p.m. Present: School Board Members Larry Donahue, Liz Durant, Louis Josephson, David Luneau, and Peter Yunich (arrived at 7:46 p.m.), Superintendent Dr. Brian Blake, Business Administrator Michelle Clark, Director of Student Services Dr. Val Aubry, Director of Technology Matt Stone, Administrative Assistant Tara Graham, Principals Michael Bessette and Bill Carozza, and Student Representative Emily Sinclair.

II. Election of Officers:

A. After a welcome to new Board member Mr. Louis Josephson, the Board commenced in nominating Officers of the Board for the 2009-2010 election year.

B. Mr. Donahue nominated Mr. Luneau for School Board Chair, Ms. Durant seconded.

C. Mr. Yunich nominated himself for School Board Chair, Mr. Donahue seconded.

D. Both nominees expanded on their strengths for the nominations. A vote was cast by show of hands, resulting in 4 votes for Mr. Luneau, 1 vote for Mr. Yunich. Mr. Luneau is the School Board Chair.

E. Mr. Donahue nominated Ms. Durant for the position of School Board Vice-Chair, Mr. Luneau seconded the nomination.

F. A vote was cast by a show of hands, all in favor, Ms. Durant is the School Board Vice Chair.

III. Comments From The Board Chair:

A. Mr. Luneau spoke regarding the issues he sees as most important going into the 2009-2010 school year. He noted that it is a year to bring back into sight bigger issues, such as, sustainability with the current economy. He also expressed that it will be a good time to revisit District goals.

IV. Additions/Deletions to the agenda:

a. None.

V. Correspondence

a. Dr. Blake received a letter from Steve Yianakopolos regarding a generous offer to donate to the Artist in Residence Program, $500 annually, through the Brenda Fund (set up for his sister).

b. Dr. Blake passed around thank you cards from members of the elderly community thanking the students of Maple Street School for the Valentines they had sent.

VI. Approval of Minutes

a. Motion to approve the 3/3/09 minutes made by Mr. Donahue, seconded by Ms. Durant, motion passes, all in favor, minutes approved, as amended.

b. Motion to approve the 3/9/09 minutes made by Mr. Donahue, seconded by Ms. Durant, motion passes, four in favor, one abstaining (Dr. Josephson, as he was not in attendance for the 3/9/09 meeting), minutes approved.

VII. Public Comments

a. Diane LaChance: Ms. LaChance read a letter she had written regarding her disapproval of Board members using school resources (i.e. e-mail lists) to express political views (i.e. SB2). She provided a copy for the record. Mr. Luneau noted that what they had used it for does fall under legal terms for usage of the lists.

b. Tom Congoran: Mr. Congoran introduced himself as the Chair of the Board of Selectmen and invited the School Board to meet with the Board of Selectmen on a more regular basis. He noted that together they could advance issues and provide more for less for the community.

c. Marion Paxton: Ms. Paxton noted that she hoped the Board had a time limit to open non-public minutes as the Selectmen do. She also noted that she is on the H2O Configuration Committee with Mr. Chamberlin and expressed her concern that at the last two meetings there was no representation from either Harold Martin or Maple Street.

d. Merle Dustin: Ms. Dustin commended the National Honor Society for the childcare they provided during the District meeting. She also noted that she thought there was a lack of respect during the flag ceremony and that that ceremony should have everyone full and undivided attention.

e. Janet Krzyzaniak: Ms. Krzyzaniak asked if the Schedule B nominations to be approved at this meeting would be affected by the contracts not passing at the District Meeting? Dr. Blake responded that these were part of the current year’s contract.

VIII. Staff Reports/Presentations

a. HMHS

· Dr. Blake fielded questions regarding Mr. Chamberlin’s report, as he was not in attendance due to a conference.

· Ms. Durant asked for an explanation of the section on NEASC. Dr. Blake explained that there was an evaluation done two years ago. They thought that our facilities were going to be hindering for us and since they have not been changed, they will be back to examine them again. Dr. Blake noted that we are still sustaining in the current space we have, so he does not expect any issues.

· Mr. Donahue asked if academic eligibility with winter athletes is a common problem? Dr. Blake said it is not uncommon due to the number of athletes we have in general, but overall, it is usually only about one or two a season.

b. MSS

· Mr. Bessette asked for any questions on his report provided in the Board packets and noted that the Curriculum and Design Conference which he and Mr. Carozza attended had extremely valuable information, which he hopes to share at a future time.

· Mr. Luneau asked about the climate recently discussed with Bill Prebble. Mr. Bessette expressed that climate has been one of the main goals all year at MSS, there has been much focus on making both Teachers and Students feel that they are respected, it has been a very rewarding and interesting process and is still moving forward. Mr. Prebble and his group “Main Street Academics”, is a local climate expert and is taking a wide lens, systematic look at the District. He will continue to work with the Leadership Team on this.

· Dr. Josephson asked how staff is being challenged to increase communication with parents? Mr. Bessette responded that better relationships start with positive communication – the Teachers have been encouraged to keep those positive lines of communication open, then the more negatives issues will be easier to approach with these lines already open.

c. HMS

· Mr. Carozza spoke regarding the issue of the new floor. He noted that the installer has contacted the manufacturer and the adhesive company who will come own and inspect the floor for free. If everything with the install and adhesive comes back OK, then the company which did the moisture testing is ready to take responsibility, should the testing be found to be the issue. More on this to come.

· Ms. Durant asked for an update on the Preschool and Kindergarten numbers. Mr. Carozza noted that so far the numbers are very good. There is about 20 plus a waiting list for Preschool and about 60 in Kindergarten.

· Dr. Josephson asked about making the NECAP results public. Mr. Carozza expressed that they could do a better job with is.

d. Business Administrator’s Report:

· Ms. Clark noted the February financials in the Board packet. All is as expected for revenue and expenditures, there are no unforeseen expenses.

· Ms. Clark also noted that today was the deadline for the foodservice RFPs.

e. Technology Director’s Report:

· Mr. Stone passed out an updated report.

· Mr. Stone noted that select Teachers in the District will be trying out Smart Boards for 60 days. Mr. Yunich asked if the right people were trying them out. Mr. Stone confirmed that the took many factors into consideration in choosing who would do the testing.

· Ms. Durant noted that it also may be interesting to involve other staff that may be assisting the students.

· Mr. Donahue requested that Mr. Stone look into other Districts that use the Smart Boards as well as an update on net books in the future.

f. Superintendent’s Report:

· Dr. Blake expanded on the items in his written report regarding the economic stimulus package. He noted that there will be 3 “pots” –

1. Title I, IDEA, the McKinney Vento Act and Impact Aid. We will see an increase in IDEA aid but on the others, we should see half by the end of March.

2. State Stabilization Fund. The government has some latitude on this. It looks as of right now that some of it may go to make the towns “whole” after the cuts from the Governor’s initial budget.

3. Tax Credit Bonds. These are limited and will most likely be based on need.

It is important to note that nothing is definitive yet.

IX. Comments From the Hopkinton School Board

a. Mr. Donahue extended his welcome to Dr. Josephson.

b. Dr. Josephson expressed his initial thoughts on tightening the information so that there is time for more pressing questions.

c. Ms. Durant also welcomed Dr. Josephson and welcomed back Mr. Donahue.

d. Mr. Yunich commented on the use of the school e-mail list. He noted that he would like a commitment from the Board not to do this again or he will request that it is reviewed by an attorney. Mr. Yunich also expressed his concern over the need for a programmatic budget, noting that he currently has four gifted students that he could provide for internships.

e. Mr. Luneau noted that he will set up a meeting with the Board’s legal council to discuss the issue of the e-mail lists. Mr. Luneau also welcomed Dr. Josephson and welcomed back Mr. Donahue.

X. Items For Board Discussion

a. Boys Varsity Baseball Trip to Connecticut

· This is a weekend trip with private funding. Ms. Clark will check if they are going to compensate for the bus if needed, but historically, it has been private transportation.

b. Calendar

· Mr. Bessette reviewed notable dates.

· Mr. Donahue noted that while he appreciates the education received in Professional Development Days, he still feels that they are wasted school days.

· Mr. Bessette expressed that better teaching happens when teachers collaborate.

· Mr. Luneau suggested that this be pushed to the next meeting.

· Mr. Donahue thanked Mr. Bessette and all involved for all of the work that went into this.

c. Schedule B Positions

· Spring Sports positions, all budgeted.

d. Committee Assignments

· Dr. Blake passed out a list of committees that typically have Board participation.

· Ms. Durant noted that the H2O committees needed to be added.

· Mr. Donahue noted that Counsel had recommended that the Board not be involved in too many committees at the day-to-day operational level.

· Mr. Yunich noted that the Budget Committee should have a member of the Negotiating Committee on it.

· Mr. Luneau called for recommendations on what to do with this for the next Board meeting.

e. Ms. Clark added that the Board needed to choose who was to be the signers of the manifest this year. Mr. Luneau and Ms. Durant volunteered and Dr. Josephson was chosen as the alternate.

XI. Public Comments

a. Jeff Eitrem: Mr. Eitrem noted that he appreciated having people on the Board that had children in the schools. He also wondered why there was no parental input on the calendar? He also asked if the Bard had considered increasing sports fees to make up for some of the lost money?

b. Diane LaChance: Commented that more parents should attend these meetings. Also, she reminded the Board of the promises made during elections and hoped these would be followed through on.

c. Janet Krzyzaniak: Asked how the public could get a copy of the Q&A to the calendar committee? Mr. Donahue responded that they could be available at the next meeting.

XII. Action Items

E. Recommend the Hopkinton School Board approve the Boys Varsity Baseball trip to Connecticut as presented. Mr. Donahue motioned, Ms. Durant seconded, all in favor, with a stipulation from Mr. Yunich that it is entirely privately funded, motion carries.

F. Recommend the Hopkinton School Board approve the Schedule B positions as presented. Mr. Donahue motioned, Ms. Josephson seconded, four in favor, one opposed (Mr. Yunich), motion carries 4-1.

G. Recommend the Hopkinton School Board approve the calendar as presented. Item tabled until the next Board meeting.

XIII. Mr. Donahue moved at 9:10 p.m. and Ms. Durant seconded that the Board enter non-public session as provided in (RSA 91-A:3, II (a)(c)) to discuss personnel. Motion passed on a roll call vote- Mr. Donahue, Ms. Durant, Dr. Josephson, Mr. Luneau, and Mr. Yunich, (all) in favor.

XIV. Following a motion by Mr. Yunich, seconded by Mr. Donahue, roll call vote- Mr. Donahue, Ms. Durant, Dr. Josephson, Mr. Luneau, and Mr. Yunich, (all) in favor, the board came out of non-public session at 10:30 p.m.

XV. Following a motion by Ms. Durant, seconded by Mr. Donahue, the board voted to seal the minutes of the non-public session for one year. Motion passed on a roll call vote- Mr. Donahue, Ms. Durant, Dr. Josephson, Mr. Luneau, and Mr. Yunich, (all) in favor.

XVI. Motion to adjourn by Mr. Donahue, seconded by Ms. Durant. Motion passed on a roll call vote- Mr. Donahue, Ms. Durant, Dr. Josephson, Mr. Luneau, and Mr. Yunich, (all) in favor.

Adjourned at 10:31 p.m.

Respectfully submitted, Tara D. Graham

Hopkinton School Board Meeting Minutes

Tuesday, March 17, 2009

Maple Street School, Hopkinton NH

Non-public minutes

XVII. Non-Public Session (RSA 91-A:3, II (a)(c)).

During the non-public session, the Board discussed personnel.

Mr. Yunich motioned to come out of Non-Public Session, seconded by Mr. Donahue. Motion passed on a roll call vote- Mr. Donahue, Ms. Durant, Dr. Josephson, Mr. Luneau, and Mr. Yunich, (all) in favor, the board came out of non-public session at 10:30 p.m.